Бюрократы, Администраторы, Редакторы
3712
правок
Are We Living In Nick Bostrom’s Speculation: различия между версиями
Перейти к навигации
Перейти к поиску
→IV. Reasoning errors in the original paper
Rodion (обсуждение | вклад) |
Rodion (обсуждение | вклад) |
||
| Строка 233: | Строка 233: | ||
In addition to the reasons against allowing nested simulations, there are reasons against running simulations of the posthuman civilisations in general. They will be examined later. | In addition to the reasons against allowing nested simulations, there are reasons against running simulations of the posthuman civilisations in general. They will be examined later. | ||
= IV. | = IV. Reasoning errors in the original paper = | ||
The main mistakes in the Bostrom article are related to circular reasoning, auto-reference, observational bias and causation errors. To sum it in a few words, it is not correct to derive anything from our experience if we live in a simulation. | The main mistakes in the Bostrom article are related to circular reasoning, auto-reference, observational bias and causation errors. To sum it in a few words, it is not correct to derive anything from our experience if we live in a simulation. | ||