Бюрократы, Администраторы, Редакторы
3712
правок
Are We Living In Nick Bostrom’s Speculation: различия между версиями
Перейти к навигации
Перейти к поиску
→VI. Errors in The Interpretation of the Simulation Argument
Rodion (обсуждение | вклад) |
Rodion (обсуждение | вклад) |
||
| Строка 300: | Строка 300: | ||
Bostrom says “[the] simulation argument works equally well for those who think that it will take hundreds of thousands of years to reach a “posthuman” stage of civilisation”. But this is not the case. The development of posthuman civilisation in the base reality may take much longer than in a simulation, for example because all simulations have accelerated scientific and technological development for convenience of the observers. If that is the case, the <i>H<sub>base</sub></i> value (the number of people who lived in the base civilisation before it reached the posthuman stage) can be much greater than [[Image:image006.gif|top]]. That would force <i>f<sub>sim</sub></i>, to be much lower, making the probability of living in a real world much higher. | Bostrom says “[the] simulation argument works equally well for those who think that it will take hundreds of thousands of years to reach a “posthuman” stage of civilisation”. But this is not the case. The development of posthuman civilisation in the base reality may take much longer than in a simulation, for example because all simulations have accelerated scientific and technological development for convenience of the observers. If that is the case, the <i>H<sub>base</sub></i> value (the number of people who lived in the base civilisation before it reached the posthuman stage) can be much greater than [[Image:image006.gif|top]]. That would force <i>f<sub>sim</sub></i>, to be much lower, making the probability of living in a real world much higher. | ||
= VI. | = VI. Errors in The Interpretation of the Simulation Argument = | ||
== Laws governing the simulations == | == Laws governing the simulations == | ||