Are We Living In Nick Bostrom’s Speculation: различия между версиями

Are We Living In Nick Bostrom’s Speculation (править)

Версия от 19:15, 21 августа 2024

497 байт добавлено , 21 август

нет описания правки

Rodion

Бюрократы, Администраторы, Редакторы

3667

правок

@@ Строка 15: / Строка 15: @@
 &nbsp;
-''The rapid development of computing technologies can make possible realistic computer simulations inhabited with intelligent humans. The Simulation Argument, proposed by Nick Bostrom[[#ftn1|[1]]] ''in the article Are You Living In a Computer Simulation, states that if such simulations will be created by us or our descendants, then we almost certainly live in a computer simulation. This paper analyses serious mathematical and logical errors in the Simulation Argument. It follows that the Simulation Argument is incorrect and the reality of our world remains a question of individual beliefs.''
+''The rapid development of computing technologies can make possible realistic computer simulations inhabited with intelligent humans. The Simulation Argument, proposed by [[Nick Bostrom]]<ref>Nick Bostrom — a researcher in the field of philosophy of science, ethics of technology and science, transhumanism. From 2000 to 2002 a lecturer in the Department of Philosophy of Yale University (USA), from 2003 a Research Fellow in Oxford University (United Kingdom). Author of 16 articles on topics of anthropic principle, technological development, artificial intelligence and simulation argument. Author of the book Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects. 2002. Routledge, New York.</ref>''in the article Are You Living In a Computer Simulation, states that if such simulations will be created by us or our descendants, then we almost certainly live in a computer simulation. This paper analyses serious mathematical and logical errors in the Simulation Argument. It follows that the Simulation Argument is incorrect and the reality of our world remains a question of individual beliefs.''
 &nbsp;