Редактирование:
Chapter 4. "Work and purpose"
Перейти к навигации
Перейти к поиску
Внимание:
Вы не вошли в систему. Ваш IP-адрес будет общедоступен, если вы запишете какие-либо изменения. Если вы
войдёте
или
создадите учётную запись
, её имя будет использоваться вместо IP-адреса, наряду с другими преимуществами.
Анти-спам проверка.
Не
заполняйте это!
[[File:Transcending Politics cover.jpg|thumb|right|Chapter 4. "Work and purpose" pages 65 - 94]] '''Chapter 4. "Work and purpose"''' is the title of the fourth Chapter in the book ''Transcending Politics'' by [[David Wood]]. "The robots are coming. In the worst case, sometime later this century, they might run amok and kill us all. That’s the Terminator scenario. It’s not as absurd as you might think. After all, software, which is the animating power behind modern robots, has a history of going wrong. And super-complex software has a risk of going super-wrong. We’ll come back to the Terminator scenario in later chapters. For now, however, there’s a shorter-term worry to consider. Instead of robots that might kill humans, we have to think about robots that might kill jobs. Robots may become so good at doing the kinds of work that we humans currently get paid to do, that our present jobs might disappear. The short label for this process is “technological unemployment”. [[Technological unemployment]] is a prospect which causes a lot of alarm. But the Transpolitica vision sees a larger opportunity in the rise of robots. Society should be able to welcome the disappearance of the need for people to undertake work that has often been tiresome, tedious, dangerous, or dispiriting. With the help of robots, we should all be able to spend much more of our time in activities that express and enhance our humanity." :: - [[David Wood]], Executive Director, [[Transpolitica]]<ref>https://transpolitica.org/</ref> ==The rise of the robots== <blockquote>Robots have been killing jobs, on noteworthy scale, since the first Industrial Revolution. </blockquote> ==Automation accelerates== <blockquote>As recently as 2004, economists Frank Levy of MIT and Richard Murnane of Harvard confidently included the task of “driving a truck” in a list of occupations for which “computerization should have little effect on the percentage of the work force engaged in these tasks”. </blockquote> ==Machine learning powers ahead== <blockquote>Machine learning has existed, in various forms, almost as long as standard artificial intelligence. But it's only in the present decade that it has achieved significant results - aided by much more powerful computers, and larger datasets, than were previously available. </blockquote> ==80% job transformation?== <blockquote>As I mentioned, machine learning heralds a second era of artificial intelligence - one in which software plays a big part in determining the rules by which it operates. </blockquote> ==Limits to retraining== <blockquote>Here's one response that is often heard to the threat of technological unemployment. Don't worry; humans will be able to retrain, moving to a new profession. The retraining may take some time, resulting, perhaps, in a temporary reduction in early earnings. </blockquote> ==Robots and humans in work partnership?== <blockquote>Here's a second response that is often raised to the threat of technological unemployment. When costs reduce for part of a task (due to automation), companies can provide their products and services more cheaply, reaching lower price points than before. </blockquote> ==Three possible futures for automation== <blockquote>It’s time to take a different perspective on the main trend discussed in this chapter. Let's start with observation that automation is likely to generate large amounts of additional profits. There are three views on what is expected to happen with these profits... </blockquote> ==Citizen’s income Qs & As== <blockquote>Thanks to automation and the general prosperity arising from it, society has more money to cover, if it chooses, the cost when people ...Ten Questions</blockquote> ==The pace of change== <blockquote>''Q10: How urgent are these discussions? Isn’t significant technological unemployment still many generations into the future?'' A: The pace of change is, notoriously, hard to predict. Roy Amara, the past president of the Institute of the Future, observe that<ref>“Roy Amara, forecaster, RIP” http://boingboing.net/2008/01/03/roy-amara-forecaster.html</ref>: "We tend to overestimate the effect of technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run." </blockquote> ==External links== * [https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B079R3RHCL/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i3 Buy the Book] * [https://transpolitica.org/projects/transcending-politics/endnotes/ For convenience of readers, this page lists all the endnotes from Transcending Politics, in easily clickable form.] ==References== {{Reflist}} [[Category:Books]] [[Category:Non-fiction]] [[Category:Politics]] [[Category:Transpolitica]] [[Category:Transcending Politics]] [[Category:David Wood]]
Описание изменений:
Пожалуйста, учтите, что любой ваш вклад в проект «hpluswiki» может быть отредактирован или удалён другими участниками. Если вы не хотите, чтобы кто-либо изменял ваши тексты, не помещайте их сюда.
Вы также подтверждаете, что являетесь автором вносимых дополнений, или скопировали их из источника, допускающего свободное распространение и изменение своего содержимого (см.
Hpluswiki:Авторские права
).
НЕ РАЗМЕЩАЙТЕ БЕЗ РАЗРЕШЕНИЯ ОХРАНЯЕМЫЕ АВТОРСКИМ ПРАВОМ МАТЕРИАЛЫ!
Отменить
Справка по редактированию
(в новом окне)
Шаблон, используемый на этой странице:
Шаблон:Reflist
(
править
)
Навигация
Персональные инструменты
Вы не представились системе
Обсуждение
Вклад
Создать учётную запись
Войти
Пространства имён
Статья
Обсуждение
русский
Просмотры
Читать
Править
История
Ещё
Навигация
Начало
Свежие правки
Случайная страница
Инструменты
Ссылки сюда
Связанные правки
Служебные страницы
Сведения о странице
Дополнительно
Как редактировать
Вики-разметка
Telegram
Вконтакте
backup